non-decr_pc_after_break i386 targets
Kevin Buettner
kevinb@redhat.com
Mon Aug 16 18:59:00 GMT 2004
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 21:34:04 +0200 (CEST)
Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl> wrote:
> However, this also reveals a flaw in the way we handle
> decr_pc_after_break. Currently it's part of the architecture vector,
> which essentially means that we consider it part of the ISA. However,
> the above shows that it also depends on the target interface. So it
> seems we should make it possible for the target vector to override the
> default set by the architecture vector.
>
> To people agree with this analysis?
Yes, I agree.
Kevin
More information about the Gdb
mailing list