Question about args.exp test
Andrew Cagney
cagney@gnu.org
Thu Apr 22 14:27:00 GMT 2004
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 09:33:34AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
>>> On Apr 21 14:44, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>>
>>>> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 06:40:40PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>
>>>>> > > Why is args.exp expecting two apostrophes and who's supposed to add them?
>>>>> > > The args testapplication apparently isn't.
>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > IIRC, the comments are wrong. The tests can not be fixed for the ARM
>>>> > simulator, though - I spent several days trying. Trace the path that
>>>> > argv takes through from the GDB prompt to the inferior main(), if you
>>>> > want some gruesome entertainment:
>>>> > - it is word split by GDB before invoking the sim
>>>> > - it is reconstructed into a string by the sim/RDI interface
>>>> > - it is word split again in either newlib or libgloss, in handwritten
>>>> > assembly
>>>> >
>>>> > The interface simply does not permit properly quoted arguments.
>>
>>>
>>> Uh, that explains it.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the description,
>
>
> Should probably be xfail'd for arm-elf. I never did because,
> conceptually, someone could be testing arm-elf with a different target
> than the simulator and a differently protocol than RDI and a different
> library than newlib - but in practice I doubt anyone does, so if you
> want to stick a comment and some xfails in...
It's a bug. There's nothing stopping someone fixing the sim target.
Andrew
More information about the Gdb
mailing list