Static variables incorrect address

[Salman Khilji]

I would tend to agree with Mike.  I have used this feature with lots of 
different cases.  It works very nicely with both C and C++.  plus, you dont' 
even have to issue the run command.  You can lookup the address right after 
the startup.

There was once a problem with static member variables like these inside C++ 
namepsaces.  But that was fixed in 5.1


Salman


>From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
>To: Kiranmaye Gannabathula <kiranmaye.gannabathula@powervr.com>
>CC: "'gdb@sources.redhat.com'" <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
>Subject: Re: Static variables incorrect address
>Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 16:12:53 -0800
>
>Kiranmaye Gannabathula wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > I have a problem with the global static variables in gdb.
> >
> > For a C program as below
> >
> > static int Data = 9;
> >
> > int Func1(void)
> > {
> >         return Data;
> > }
> >
> > if i compile this with debug info and run it under gdb, when i 
>breakpoint on
> > the variable Data and try to print its value i get some value and
> > if i look at the address
> > p /x Data
> > i get some invalid address.
>
>I believe you want to say "p /x &Data".
>Otherwise you will be looking at memory at an address
>determined by the value of the variable "Data".



_________________________________________________________________
Join the worldÂ’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com