problem w/ igen, multiple -M models, and -G gen-multi-sim.

[cgd@broadcom.com]

At Thu, 14 Mar 2002 21:46:08 -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Turns out that such instructions need to be given unique field-names as 
> they would otherwise generate functions with the same name.

Right.  In the example, yes, they had unique field names, but until
your patch that had no effect.

(still don't need/want to use the feature, but better to have it
fixed than not.  8-)


> See attached.  It works for your example.

Are you planning to check it in after a delay or some futher testing
on your end?  or you want me/others to throw it into our source trees
and it a spin to mmake sure it doesn't break anything?


thanks,

chris