Inclusion of FORTRAN95 testsuite into GDB?
Petr Sorfa
petrs@caldera.com
Wed Aug 14 13:38:00 GMT 2002
Hi Fernando,
I forgot to mention that the testsuite has been considerably improved
and expanded. I've also received a patch from Arnaud Desitter which
fixes some minor standard conformancy issues. I'll make the changes to
the testsuite as you requested and send it for review. Give me a couple
of days ;o)
Petr
>
> Petr Sorfa wrote:
> >
> > > 3) Are there any objections in the mailing list?
> > I think you'll need to forward/CC this to the mailing list.
> >
>
> Well, nobody complained so far (I don't see why they should).
>
> We will have to work a little bit on the part where you test for
> the right architecture and looks for the compiler etc.
> BTW, puts is not the right way to display messages.
>
> Also there is a DejaGNU function called target_compile that you should
> use for compiling your test programs (feed it with compiler=ifc or efc).
> The right way of doing it would be through gdb_compile. I may have to
> fix something for you to use it, but that would be better than calling
> the target_compile one directly. As Michael said, it would be nice to
> have the environment variable to set the compiler to something
> different than the default (which will have to be g95 eventually).
>
> And we may have remote targets (things that run on boards) with an Intel
> architecture (these things use cross compilers). The way you are
> testing for the architecture, you are only testing that the host you are
> running is of a certain architecture, not the target. Check around for
> similar tests (look in the testsuite/lib files). Anyway, these Intel
> compilers are native only, right?
>
> Regards,
> Fernando
>
> --
> Fernando Nasser
> Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
> 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
> Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9
More information about the Gdb
mailing list