[RFC stub-side break conditions 3/5] GDB-side changes

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:

>>> I suggest "cond.eval." instead of "condeval".  Better yet, how about
>>> "evaluated by"?

>> Sounds good. I'll make that change.

Pedro> Isn't that only visible by MI?  Are spaces valid in MI field names?

Yes, it is only visible to MI.

The MI spec does not rule out spaces AFAICT, but I would rather we stick
to names similar to those we already use.  On this basis, "condeval" is
better than "cond.eval.".

Tom