[RFC stub-side break conditions 3/5] GDB-side changes

[Pedro Alves]

On 01/06/2012 10:37 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
> On 01/06/2012 06:44 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

>>> +      /* Print whether the remote stub is doing the breakpoint's condition
>>> +     evaluation.  If GDB is doing the evaluation, don't print anything.  */
>>> +      if (loc&&  is_breakpoint (b)&&  loc->cond_bytecode
>>> +    &&  breakpoint_condition_evaluation_mode ()
>>> +      != condition_evaluation_gdb)
>>> +    {
>>> +      ui_out_text (uiout, " (");
>>> +      ui_out_field_string (uiout, "condeval",
>>> +                   breakpoint_condition_evaluation_mode ());
>> I suggest "cond.eval." instead of "condeval".  Better yet, how about
>> "evaluated by"?
> Sounds good. I'll make that change.

Isn't that only visible by MI?  Are spaces valid in MI field names?