[ECOS] libc-time-clock test doesn't seem to be written correctly??

[Brij Bihari Pandey]

Hi Jonathan,

> > test FAIL messages. Possibly I would have - how could there be problem with
the
> > test, wouldn't anyone on list have mentioned it earlier, if it was so?
>
> Not necessarily I suppose. But there would probably have been something in 
> the wide variety of hardware that used to exist in the Red Hat test farm.

You mean eCos people at RedHat were aware of this problem?

I am attaching the "cvs diff -u5 -p" output for the clock.c file along with
this mail for your reviewing.

Changelog :
Added permissible absolute deviation from mean value to take care of incorrect
failure conclusions in case of small mean values.

brij


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: clock_c.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1881 bytes
Desc: clock_c.patch
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/ecos-discuss/attachments/20030621/1c4b3d2d/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss