resolving symbolic links
Tue Nov 30 23:39:00 GMT 1999
On Fri, Nov 26, 1999 at 03:05:49AM -0500, William Wylde wrote:
>I've found that ls -l (lowercase 'l') works quite well with b20.1- I can't
>speak for the 1.0 CD version, however. Since ls -L you suggest below
>DOESN'T work with b20.1, I think it might prove to be the same under 1.0...
ls -L works on the CD. I'm fairly certain that it works under B20.1, as
What someone might consider "works" is open to question but since it behaves
the same under Cygwin as it does on Unix, it's obviously working correctly.
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More information about the Cygwin