resolving symbolic links
Donald E. Hammond
Tue Nov 30 23:39:00 GMT 1999
As Chris Faylor pointed out, ls -L works fine. It was my expectations
of what it was supposed to do that were faulty.
William Wylde wrote:
> Hi, Donald-
> I've found that ls -l (lowercase 'l') works quite well with b20.1- I can't
> speak for the 1.0 CD version, however. Since ls -L you suggest below
> DOESN'T work with b20.1, I think it might prove to be the same under 1.0...
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to email@example.com
More information about the Cygwin