What about RSXNT instead of cygwin32???

[Geoffrey Noer]

> Yes, I've tried that and it certainly seems to be a class act,
> although not as ambitious as cygwin32.

>From what I have heard, RSXNT sounds like it does significantly
less but isn't beta quality.  I've also heard that nobody is actively
maintaining RSXNT -- anyone know differently?

I hope Cygwin32 will be a class act some day.  :-)

> On the other hand, RSXNT includes a resource compiler

BTW, future GNU-Win32 releases will include one.

-- 
Geoffrey Noer
noer@cygnus.com
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".