What about RSXNT instead of cygwin32???

Geoffrey Noer noer@cygnus.com
Wed Oct 15 14:31:00 GMT 1997

> Yes, I've tried that and it certainly seems to be a class act,
> although not as ambitious as cygwin32.

>From what I have heard, RSXNT sounds like it does significantly
less but isn't beta quality.  I've also heard that nobody is actively
maintaining RSXNT -- anyone know differently?

I hope Cygwin32 will be a class act some day.  :-)

> On the other hand, RSXNT includes a resource compiler

BTW, future GNU-Win32 releases will include one.

Geoffrey Noer
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".

More information about the Cygwin mailing list