CFA: pseudo-reloc v2

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Oct  6 10:34, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Corinna wrote:
> > The important question here is, will v1 pseudo relocs work as
> > before? Since we simply don't have applications with v2 pseudo
> > relocs yet and since the idea is to switch to v2 after giving it a
> > longer grace period, the v2 functionality is just prep work. I'm
> > all for supporting v2 right from 1.7.1, as long as it's guranteed
> > that the v1 code path behaves as before.
> 
> v1 relocs continue to work as before, at least according to my tests
> with a current ld.

That's what concerned me.  If it still works as before, I have no
objections at all.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat