key64_t? ino64_t?

Christopher Faylor cgf@redhat.com
Sat May 10 23:58:00 GMT 2003


On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 12:55:16AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Sat, May 10, 2003 at 02:58:54PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> How does this look?  Did I miss anything?
>
>That looks promising.  ino_t isn't used very often inside of Cygwin,
>rortunately.  I'd say, check it in.
>
>> (There's also a change to dirent.h in newlib which I haven't included)
>
>d_ino is now the former __d_reserved[2], I guess?  And old_d_ino is then
>the former d_ino obviously.

Right.

>Did you also change the __DIRENT_VERSION?

Yes.  Needed a pragma pack to work correctly, too.

cgf



More information about the Cygwin-developers mailing list