key64_t? ino64_t?

Corinna Vinschen vinschen@redhat.com
Sat May 10 22:55:00 GMT 2003


On Sat, May 10, 2003 at 02:58:54PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> How does this look?  Did I miss anything?

That looks promising.  ino_t isn't used very often inside of Cygwin,
rortunately.  I'd say, check it in.

> (There's also a change to dirent.h in newlib which I haven't included)

d_ino is now the former __d_reserved[2], I guess?  And old_d_ino is then
the former d_ino obviously.

Did you also change the __DIRENT_VERSION?

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.



More information about the Cygwin-developers mailing list