quandary with pthreads

Christopher Faylor cgf@redhat.com
Thu Dec 12 08:29:00 GMT 2002

On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 01:37:37AM -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>Ok, attached is what I'd try if I was set up to try it.  I've found that you
>pretty much always need the "volatile" after the __asm__, or the newer gccs want
>to optimize your assembly away, even if they should be able to tell that you've
>got side-effects.

AFAIK, there is a volatile after the __asm__.

How about a standard unified diff so that it is easy to see what you changed?


More information about the Cygwin-developers mailing list