quandary with pthreads

Thomas Pfaff tpfaff@gmx.net
Thu Dec 12 01:46:00 GMT 2002


Yup, that did the trick.
Chris, can you take a look at it ?

Thomas

On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:

> Ok, attached is what I'd try if I was set up to try it.  I've found that
> you
> pretty much always need the "volatile" after the __asm__, or the newer
> gccs want
> to optimize your assembly away, even if they should be able to tell that
> you've
> got side-effects.
>
> --
> Gary R. Van Sickle
> Brewer.  Patriot.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cygwin-developers-owner@cygwin.com
> > [mailto:cygwin-developers-owner@cygwin.com]On Behalf Of Christopher
> > Faylor
> > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 12:03 AM
> > To: cygwin-developers@cygwin.com
> > Subject: Re: quandary with pthreads
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:53:03PM -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> > >>I have created assembler versions for the Interlocked functions that
> > >>work fine unless they are made inline (see attachment).  Maybe
> someone
> > >>with a better understanding of gcc inline assembler might have a
> look
> > >>at it).
> > >
> > >I may have the painfully-acquired honor of fitting that description.
> > >How were you trying to inline them?  Essentially as-is?  If so, I
> just
> > >may be able to help.
> >
> > The routines in question are in winbase.h.  I took inspiration for
> most
> > of them from linux.
> >
> > cgf
>
>



More information about the Cygwin-developers mailing list