Linux, requiring gperf for gcc-2.95

[Curt Mills, WE7U]

I managed to get stcarrez' HC11 patches integrated into gcc-2.95,
and got GDB, binutils, and GCC to build ok on a SuSE6.1 system,
but cannot get GCC to build on SuSE5.3, RH5.2, or RH6.0 systems
(all Linux distributions).

The main trouble I'm having is that I don't have gperf.  I
downloaded it (and the patch), but then couldn't build it
because of needing libstd++.so.  I'll assume that SuSE6.1
has it included, because I compiled everything successfully
on that system.

According to the FAQ in the gcc-2.95 directory, I shouldn't
need gperf anyway for a released version of GCC, but only for
a CVS version.  Is this correct?

Is is possible that I can snag the output files the gperf
would have produced (perhaps from my SuSE6.1 system), put them
in place and get GCC to build on my other systems?

Curt Mills, WE7U                         hacker.NO_*SPAM@tc.fluke.com
Senior Methods Engineer/SysAdmin
"Lotto:    A tax on people who are bad at math." -- unknown
"Windows:  Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates." -- WE7U

_______________________________________________
New CrossGCC FAQ: http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC
_______________________________________________
To remove yourself from the crossgcc list, send
mail to crossgcc-request@cygnus.com with the
text 'unsubscribe' (without the quotes) in the
body of the message.