Fw: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ld: shared library and PIE support for riscv*-elf and loongarch*-elf

[mintsuki]

I have done my best to follow the practices delineated:

https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2026-September/151345.html
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2026-September/151346.html
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2026-September/151348.html
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2026-September/151349.html

https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/binutils/list/?series=66239


On Wednesday, September 9th, 2026 at 8:01 AM, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:

> On 08.09.2026 23:47, mintsuki wrote:
> > I have resent the patchset with the commit messages updated.
> >
> > Not sure if I did it right, but this is the patchset as per
> > sourceware.org/pipermail:
> >
> > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2026-September/151332.html
> > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2026-September/151333.html
> > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2026-September/151334.html
> > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2026-September/151335.html
> >
> > And the patchwork.sourceware.org:
> >
> > https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/binutils/list/?series=66225
> 
> Well. As per https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2026-September/thread.html
> you sent each part (incl cover letter) as a reply to their earlier instances.
> First, new versions shouldn't be sent as replies to earlier ones. Then they
> should also be tagged accordingly (presumably v2 here). And finally the patches
> want to be replies to the cover letter, so that things thread correctly.
> 
> Jan
>