[PATCH v1 2/2] Support x86 ACE ISA

[Jan Beulich]

On 30.06.2026 10:42, Jiang, Haochen wrote:
>> From: Ganesh Gopalasubramanian <Ganesh.Gopalasubramanian@amd.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2026 7:54 PM
>>
>> --- a/gas/config/tc-i386.c
>> +++ b/gas/config/tc-i386.c
>> @@ -1200,6 +1201,7 @@ static const arch_entry cpu_arch[] =
>>    SUBARCH (pconfig, PCONFIG, PCONFIG, false),
>>    SUBARCH (waitpkg, WAITPKG, WAITPKG, false),
>>    SUBARCH (cldemote, CLDEMOTE, CLDEMOTE, false),
>> +  SUBARCH (ace, ACE, ACE, false),
>>    SUBARCH (amx_int8, AMX_INT8, ANY_AMX_INT8, false),
>>    SUBARCH (amx_bf16, AMX_BF16, ANY_AMX_BF16, false),
>>    SUBARCH (amx_fp16, AMX_FP16, ANY_AMX_FP16, false),
> 
> Should we call it as ACEV1 instead of ACE? Documentation mentioned
> it as ACEv1.

Perhaps. We have "avx10.1" and "avx10.2" as .arch specifiers as well. So
perhaps "ace_v1" as counterpart ("acev1" being a little odd without
separator)?

>> --- a/opcodes/i386-gen.c
>> +++ b/opcodes/i386-gen.c
>> @@ -263,6 +263,8 @@ static const dependency isa_dependencies[] =
>>      "RTM|HLE" },
>>    { "TSXLDTRK",
>>      "RTM" },
>> +  { "ACE",
>> +    "AVX512F|64" },
> 
> I have different opinion on this implication. I suppose it should
> directly use AVX10_V2_AUX according to documentation CPUID
> emulation part. That part clearly showed AVX10_V2_AUX is a must.

+1

Jan