[PATCH] ELF: Properly copy and strip Solaris binaries
Rainer Orth
ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
Wed Jan 28 18:56:23 GMT 2026
Hi Alan,
>> Just a few comments and questions on the patch:
>>
>> * The ChangeLog should refer to PR binutils/33718 so the commit shows up
>> in there
>
> It is sufficient to put "PR 33718" in the subject. Note that you
> need the space.
I see. GCC is different here: the convention is PR<id> without a space.
However, the ChangeLog handling of the git commit hook checks both
syntax and completeness of the mandatory ChangeLog entries in the commit
message and extracts the PR references from that.
>> * I wonder why neither the PR nor the patch refer to the extensive
>> discussion of the issue in PR binutils/33684 which prompted this PR
>> and patch.
>
> Added to the patch.
Fine, thanks.
>> * Neither the patch names nor the filenames carry any meaning. I think
>> they should be way more descriptive instead.
>>
>> * Besides, I wonder about dropping arbitrary objects into the testsuite.
>> I suspect it would be way better to rely on native testing for issues
>> like this, so we could both extend testing to all of Solaris/SPARC and
>> x86, 32 and 64-bit. Besides, it would be possible to run elfdump >
>> /dev/null on the objects which is an excellent first sanity check for
>> all kinds of objects on Solaris.
>>
>> After all, we're just one PR away from clean Solaris testresults as a
>> prerequisite for setting up such bots :-)
>
> OK, I'll remove the testcase and just commit the objcopy.c part.
Thanks. Ali already provided the native testcases in PR 33684. I'll
just take it from there.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
More information about the Binutils
mailing list