binutils 2.45.90.20260125 test results

[Matthias Klose]

On 1/28/26 09:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 28.01.2026 07:24, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> riscv64:
>> ========
>> [...]
>> Running
>> /build/reproducible-path/binutils-2.45.90.20260125/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/dwarf.exp
>> ...
>> FAIL: Handle no DWARF information

this is a regression compared to 2.45.

>> Running
>> /build/reproducible-path/binutils-2.45.90.20260125/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/shared.exp
>> ...
>> FAIL: Run pr19719 fun defined
> 
> Are these regressions? It looks to me as if both tests would have been in their
> present shape for quite a long time. The latter test also looks to be run only
> when native in a RISC-V system, which - without any further data provided -
> would then limit the set of people who can possibly look into this quite a bit.
> (Cc-ing the maintainers for this reason.)

pr19719 issue is not a regression.

> 
> IOW - while they want fixing, neither of these look to be release critical.
> This then likely extends to at least s390's similar failure of the latter of
> the above tests.
> 
> Jan