binutils 2.45.90.20260125 test results
Jan Beulich
jbeulich@suse.com
Wed Jan 28 08:05:29 GMT 2026
On 28.01.2026 07:24, Matthias Klose wrote:
> riscv64:
> ========
>[...]
> Running
> /build/reproducible-path/binutils-2.45.90.20260125/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/dwarf.exp
> ...
> FAIL: Handle no DWARF information
>
> Running
> /build/reproducible-path/binutils-2.45.90.20260125/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/shared.exp
> ...
> FAIL: Run pr19719 fun defined
Are these regressions? It looks to me as if both tests would have been in their
present shape for quite a long time. The latter test also looks to be run only
when native in a RISC-V system, which - without any further data provided -
would then limit the set of people who can possibly look into this quite a bit.
(Cc-ing the maintainers for this reason.)
IOW - while they want fixing, neither of these look to be release critical.
This then likely extends to at least s390's similar failure of the latter of
the above tests.
Jan
More information about the Binutils
mailing list