[PATCH v2 5/7] RISC-V: relax post-relocation-operator separator expectation

[Jan Beulich]

On 25.04.2023 10:44, Nelson Chu wrote:
> Thanks for the information, Andreas.  The riscv-asm should be the right
> place to see the expected behaviors, and discuss the related stuff :-)

Just to clarify: Is this a request to replace this patch by one insisting
on the use of a parenthesis? If so, I can certainly do that, and commit
only the remaining patches (as per your other reply).

Jan

> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 4:37 PM Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> On Mär 10 2023, Jan Beulich via Binutils wrote:
>>
>>> With a blank being okay as a separator, constructs like
>>>
>>>       lui     t0, %hi sym
>>>       lui     t0, %hi 0x1000
>>>
>>> are accepted. But then it makes little sense to not also accept e.g.
>>>
>>>       lui     t0, %hi +sym
>>>       lui     t0, %hi -0x1000
>>
>> https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-asm-manual/blob/master/riscv-asm.md
>> always includes the parens around the expression, and I don't think it
>> should be accepted without them.
>>
>> --
>> Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
>> GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510  2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
>> "And now for something completely different."
>>
>