[PATCH] x86: drop "regmask" static variable

[H.J. Lu]

On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 12:40 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>
> Replace its two uses by more direct checks, paralleling what's already
> there for SIMD registers.
>
> --- a/gas/config/tc-i386.c
> +++ b/gas/config/tc-i386.c
> @@ -1907,7 +1907,6 @@ operand_type_xor (i386_operand_type x, i
>  static const i386_operand_type anydisp = OPERAND_TYPE_ANYDISP;
>  static const i386_operand_type anyimm = OPERAND_TYPE_ANYIMM;
>  static const i386_operand_type regxmm = OPERAND_TYPE_REGXMM;
> -static const i386_operand_type regmask = OPERAND_TYPE_REGMASK;
>  static const i386_operand_type imm8 = OPERAND_TYPE_IMM8;
>  static const i386_operand_type imm8s = OPERAND_TYPE_IMM8S;
>  static const i386_operand_type imm16 = OPERAND_TYPE_IMM16;
> @@ -8190,7 +8189,7 @@ if(flag_debug) fprintf(stderr, "%s: imm=
>                   || ((op.bitfield.class != Reg
>                        || (!op.bitfield.dword && !op.bitfield.qword))
>                       && op.bitfield.class != RegSIMD
> -                     && !operand_type_equal (&op, &regmask)))
> +                     && op.bitfield.class != RegMask))
>                 abort ();
>               i.vex.register_specifier = i.op[vvvv].regs;
>               dest++;
> @@ -8601,7 +8600,7 @@ if(flag_debug) fprintf(stderr, "%s: imm=
>               if ((type->bitfield.class != Reg
>                    || (!type->bitfield.dword && !type->bitfield.qword))
>                   && type->bitfield.class != RegSIMD
> -                 && !operand_type_equal (type, &regmask))
> +                 && type->bitfield.class != RegMask)
>                 abort ();
>
>               i.vex.register_specifier = i.op[vex_reg].regs;

OK.

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.