[PATCH] x86: drop "regmask" static variable
Jan Beulich
jbeulich@suse.com
Wed Oct 5 07:40:50 GMT 2022
Replace its two uses by more direct checks, paralleling what's already
there for SIMD registers.
--- a/gas/config/tc-i386.c
+++ b/gas/config/tc-i386.c
@@ -1907,7 +1907,6 @@ operand_type_xor (i386_operand_type x, i
static const i386_operand_type anydisp = OPERAND_TYPE_ANYDISP;
static const i386_operand_type anyimm = OPERAND_TYPE_ANYIMM;
static const i386_operand_type regxmm = OPERAND_TYPE_REGXMM;
-static const i386_operand_type regmask = OPERAND_TYPE_REGMASK;
static const i386_operand_type imm8 = OPERAND_TYPE_IMM8;
static const i386_operand_type imm8s = OPERAND_TYPE_IMM8S;
static const i386_operand_type imm16 = OPERAND_TYPE_IMM16;
@@ -8190,7 +8189,7 @@ if(flag_debug) fprintf(stderr, "%s: imm=
|| ((op.bitfield.class != Reg
|| (!op.bitfield.dword && !op.bitfield.qword))
&& op.bitfield.class != RegSIMD
- && !operand_type_equal (&op, ®mask)))
+ && op.bitfield.class != RegMask))
abort ();
i.vex.register_specifier = i.op[vvvv].regs;
dest++;
@@ -8601,7 +8600,7 @@ if(flag_debug) fprintf(stderr, "%s: imm=
if ((type->bitfield.class != Reg
|| (!type->bitfield.dword && !type->bitfield.qword))
&& type->bitfield.class != RegSIMD
- && !operand_type_equal (type, ®mask))
+ && type->bitfield.class != RegMask)
abort ();
i.vex.register_specifier = i.op[vex_reg].regs;
More information about the Binutils
mailing list