[PATCH 0/3] x86: correct checking of matching operand sizes

[Jan Beulich]

On 23.11.2022 22:39, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 2:32 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>
>> I've spotted a few cases where operand sizes matching wasn't really
>> checked, leading to malformed insn/operand combinations to be
>> accepted (in the first patch another anomaly is also taken care of).
>> This mainly, but not only affects Intel Syntax.
>>
>> 1: correct handling of LAR and LSL
>> 2: add missing CheckRegSize
>> 3: widen applicability and use of CheckRegSize
>>
>> Jan
> 
> OK to all.

Thanks. I've committed these, but I wonder whether you may have overlooked
the remark in the last patch as to the name "CheckRegSize".

Jan