[PATCH 0/3] x86: correct checking of matching operand sizes

[H.J. Lu]

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 2:32 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>
> I've spotted a few cases where operand sizes matching wasn't really
> checked, leading to malformed insn/operand combinations to be
> accepted (in the first patch another anomaly is also taken care of).
> This mainly, but not only affects Intel Syntax.
>
> 1: correct handling of LAR and LSL
> 2: add missing CheckRegSize
> 3: widen applicability and use of CheckRegSize
>
> Jan

OK to all.

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.