[PATCH] x86: SKINIT with operand needs IgnoreSize

[H.J. Lu]

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 4:33 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>
> Without it in 16-bit mode a pointless operand size prefix would be
> emitted.
>
> --- a/opcodes/i386-opc.tbl
> +++ b/opcodes/i386-opc.tbl
> @@ -2068,7 +2068,7 @@ clgi, 0xf01dd, None, CpuSVME, No_bSuf|No
>  invlpga, 0xf01df, None, CpuSVME, No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, {}
>  invlpga, 0xf01df, None, CpuSVME, AddrPrefixOpReg, { Acc|Word|Dword|Qword, RegC|Dword }
>  skinit, 0xf01de, None, CpuSVME, No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, {}
> -skinit, 0xf01de, None, CpuSVME, No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, { Acc|Dword }
> +skinit, 0xf01de, None, CpuSVME, No_bSuf|IgnoreSize|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, { Acc|Dword }
>  stgi, 0xf01dc, None, CpuSVME, No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, {}
>  vmgexit, 0xf30f01d9, None, CpuSEV_ES, No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, {}
>  vmload, 0xf01da, None, CpuSVME, No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, {}

Can you add a testcase?

Thanks.


-- 
H.J.