glibc 2.36 - Slushy freeze (3 weeks to release)
Xi Ruoyao
xry111@xry111.site
Tue Jul 12 01:02:48 GMT 2022
On Tue, 2022-07-12 at 08:48 +0800, Xi Ruoyao via Libc-alpha wrote:
> > So do we need a binutils 2.39 to have a workable glibc build or is the
> > 2.38 suffice?
>
> We need a 2.39, or backport one change [1] to 2.38.
>
> [1]: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=3b14682a
P. S. this change is not only needed to build glibc, but also needed to
build anything with GCC. That's why I said "completely unusable".
Maybe "completely" is too strong: 2.38 is functional with this change
backported.
And yes, it's already backported into binutils-2.38 branch [2]. But we
didn't get a new 2.38.1 release containing it :(.
[2]: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=d54081c6
(To be fair: a plain binutils-2.38 release also does not work fine for
x86 and we had to backport changes [3][4] too.)
[3]: https://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/5011
[4]: https://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/5012
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
More information about the Binutils
mailing list