glibc 2.36 - Slushy freeze (3 weeks to release)

Xi Ruoyao xry111@xry111.site
Tue Jul 12 01:02:48 GMT 2022


On Tue, 2022-07-12 at 08:48 +0800, Xi Ruoyao via Libc-alpha wrote:

> > So do we need a binutils 2.39 to have a workable glibc build or is the
> > 2.38 suffice?
> 
> We need a 2.39, or backport one change [1] to 2.38.
> 
> [1]: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=3b14682a

P. S. this change is not only needed to build glibc, but also needed to
build anything with GCC.  That's why I said "completely unusable". 
Maybe "completely" is too strong: 2.38 is functional with this change
backported.

And yes, it's already backported into binutils-2.38 branch [2].  But we
didn't get a new 2.38.1 release containing it :(.

[2]: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=d54081c6

(To be fair: a plain binutils-2.38 release also does not work fine for
x86 and we had to backport changes [3][4] too.)

[3]: https://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/5011
[4]: https://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/5012
-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University


More information about the Binutils mailing list