[PATCH 0/4] x86: opcode table tidying

[H.J. Lu]

On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 6:56 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On 06.01.2022 15:31, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 5:52 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 06.01.2022 14:47, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 5:24 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 05.01.2022 15:58, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 12:20:05PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>>>>> 1: templatize FMA insn templates
> >>>>>> 2: drop some "comm" template parameters
> >>>>>> 3: drop NoAVX from POPCNT
> >>>>>> 4: drop NoAVX insn attribute
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> OK for all.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks. I've committed the series, but I wonder whether you have an
> >>>> opinion on the SSE4a aspect mentioned in the last patch.
> >>>
> >>> Do you have a patch?
> >>
> >> A patch to do what, exactly? (IOW: In order to perhaps make a patch, I
> >> need to understand what the intentions are.)
> >
> > Please open a bug report to describe the issue.
>
> I guess I'll give up here. I can't know whether there's a bug without
> knowing what the intentions are. Documentation also isn't sufficiently
> clear / unambiguous. And I'm not willing to abuse bugzilla for having
> a discussion; that's what I thought the mailing list is for.
>
> Jan
>

Are there any SSE instructions in SSE4a that aren't checked?
If yes, is it a bug?

-- 
H.J.