[PATCH] Fix the disassembly of the AArch64 SVE DECP/INCP/SQDECP/SQINCP instruction.

[Shaokun Zhang]

Hi Jan,

Thanks for your quick reply.

On 2022/2/7 17:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 07.02.2022 10:34, Shaokun Zhang via Binutils wrote:
>> From: Jingtao Cai <caijingtao@huawei.com>
>>
>> This patch fix qualifier for the AArch64 SVE DECP/INCP/SQDECP/SQINCP instruction, which take the predicate size specifier:
>> 	DECP <Zdn>.<T>, <Pm>.<T>
>> 	INCP <Zdn>.<T>, <Pm>.<T>
>> 	SQINCP <Zdn>.<T>, <Pm>.<T>
>> 	SQDECP <Zdn>.<T>, <Pm>.<T>
>>
>> Omitted predicate size specifier will be prohibited in a future release of the architecture, please refer to Arm A64 Instruction set documentation for Armv8-A
>> architecture profile, see document[0].
>>
>> [0]: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0596/2021-12/SVE-Instructions/DECP--vector---Decrement-vector-by-count-of-true-predicate-elements-
>>
>> E.g. :
>>
>> DECP Z1.H, P0.H
>>
>> This patch adds support for this kind of operand.
>>
>> DECP Z1.H, P0
>>
>> This instruction leads to messages:
>> Assembler messages:
>> Error: operand mismatch -- `decp Z1.h,P0'
> 
> IOW unlike the title suggests you change not only the disassembly

Correct, current title is not quite accurate and how about `aarch64:
allow explicit size specifier for predicate operand of decp/incp`?

> logic. Wouldn't it be better to make this a warning initially, and
> convert to an error only a few releases later? That way people
> don't need to immediately fix their code.
> 

Agree, we can make both `decp z1.h, p0` and `decp z1.h, p0.h` get
assembled successfully and emit an warning for `decp z1.h, p0`,
then everyone will be happy for now.

>> 	did you mean this?
>> 		decp z1.h, p0.h
>> 	other valid variant(s):
>> 		decp z1.s, p0
>> 		decp z1.d, p0
> 
> Isn't this misleading? Should these "other valid variant(s)" also
> be output with suffixes?
> 

Oops, apologies for the stupid typo, it does output with suffixes actually.

Thanks,

> Jan
> 
> .
>