[PATCH] *-*-hpux*: Don't use build_wrapper in copy_setup on hpux

[John David Anglin]

On 2020-08-28 1:16 a.m., Alan Modra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 04:49:56PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
>> diff --git a/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objcopy.exp b/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objcopy.exp
>> index 9877f3d310..eaa3db19ea 100644
>> --- a/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objcopy.exp
>> +++ b/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objcopy.exp
>> @@ -631,7 +631,11 @@ proc copy_setup { } {
>>      global test_prog
>>      global host_triplet
>>
>> -    set res [build_wrapper testglue.o]
>> +    if { ![istarget *-*-hpux*] } {
>> +	set res [build_wrapper testglue.o]
>> +    } else {
>> +	set res ""
>> +    }
>>      set flags { debug }
>>
>>      if { [istarget *-*-uclinux*] && ![istarget tic6x-*-*] && ![istarget arm*-*-uclinuxfdpiceabi] } {
> That can't be correct.  It shouldn't depend on target, since I can run
> the testsuite on a cross from x86_64-linux to hppa-hp-hpux10 say
> without seeing the problem you run into on native hpux.  In fact, what
> you should be testing is "am I linking with GNU ld?", or really, a
> linker that supports -wrap.
I take your point but I don't believe that it's possible to run these tests on a cross from
x86_64-linux to hppa-hp-hpux10 as they depend on the native linker for hppa-hp-hpux10.
It only runs on hppa-hp-hpux10 and I don't believe the x86_64-linux linker can create
SOM compatible binaries.

Maybe ishost or isnative would be better than istarget but I'm not sure how to properly avoid using
build_wrapper.

-- 
John David Anglin  dave.anglin@bell.net