[PATCH 1/4] x86: correctly encode FSUBP

[Jan Beulich]

>>> On 07.03.18 at 13:30, <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 1:47 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>> While the combination of Intel syntax and AT&T mnemonics is bogus
>> anyway, we nevertheless shouldn't mis-encode such insns.
>>
>> gas/
>> 2018-03-07  Jan Beulich  <jbeulich@suse.com>
>>
>>         * testsuite/gas/i386/fsubp.l, testsuite/gas/i386/fsubp.s: New.
>>         * testsuite/gas/i386/i386.exp: Run new test.
>>
>> opcodes/
>> 2018-03-07  Jan Beulich  <jbeulich@suse.com>
>>
>>         * i386-opc.tbl (fsubp): Correct encoding.
>>         * i386-tlb.h: Re-generate.
>>
> 
> I assume that no one uses it.  Can't we simply drop it?

I don't know, and would dare to chance it. But perhaps you know
better than me. Of course, if we drop this one, there are others to
be dropped at the same time.

Jan