[PATCH 1/4] x86: correctly encode FSUBP

[H.J. Lu]

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 1:47 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> While the combination of Intel syntax and AT&T mnemonics is bogus
> anyway, we nevertheless shouldn't mis-encode such insns.
>
> gas/
> 2018-03-07  Jan Beulich  <jbeulich@suse.com>
>
>         * testsuite/gas/i386/fsubp.l, testsuite/gas/i386/fsubp.s: New.
>         * testsuite/gas/i386/i386.exp: Run new test.
>
> opcodes/
> 2018-03-07  Jan Beulich  <jbeulich@suse.com>
>
>         * i386-opc.tbl (fsubp): Correct encoding.
>         * i386-tlb.h: Re-generate.
>

I assume that no one uses it.  Can't we simply drop it?

-- 
H.J.