binutils-2_28-branch: Various RISC-V Fixes

[Palmer Dabbelt]

On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 02:21:01 PST (-0800), Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
>> On 24 Feb 2017, at 18:42, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> wrote:
>>
>> Here are the three RISC-V patches that aren't on the 2.28 branch but are on
>> master.  One has been submitted for 2.28, but I haven't gotten any feedback,
>> while the other two are new.
>>
>> We'd really like these in the release so we can build Linux with the 2.28
>> release rather that having to tell the Linux devs to patch it or get binutils
>> master.
>>
>> Are these OK for the 2.28 branch?
>>
>> Also: I'd like to check on the policy for commiting to 2.28.  I haven't gotten
>> any feedback on my "OK for 2.28?" messages recently and I was told that I
>> needed an OK for the 2.28 branch from Tristan Gingold.  I haven't seen any mail
>> from Tristan Gingold recently, but when I went to rebase I saw a bunch of
>> patches committed.  Am I asking for approval incorrectly?
>
> Yes, they are OK.

Thanks!  They've been pushed.

> You are asking correctly, but I have a backlog of emails to read.  Sorry!

No problem.  I just didn't want to screw something up.