binutils-2_28-branch: Various RISC-V Fixes

[Tristan Gingold]

> On 24 Feb 2017, at 18:42, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> wrote:
> 
> Here are the three RISC-V patches that aren't on the 2.28 branch but are on
> master.  One has been submitted for 2.28, but I haven't gotten any feedback,
> while the other two are new.
> 
> We'd really like these in the release so we can build Linux with the 2.28
> release rather that having to tell the Linux devs to patch it or get binutils
> master.
> 
> Are these OK for the 2.28 branch?
> 
> Also: I'd like to check on the policy for commiting to 2.28.  I haven't gotten
> any feedback on my "OK for 2.28?" messages recently and I was told that I
> needed an OK for the 2.28 branch from Tristan Gingold.  I haven't seen any mail
> from Tristan Gingold recently, but when I went to rebase I saw a bunch of
> patches committed.  Am I asking for approval incorrectly?

Yes, they are OK.

You are asking correctly, but I have a backlog of emails to read.  Sorry!

Thanks,
Tristan.