[PATCH] PR gold/18695

[H.J. Lu]

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:42 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Andrew Senkevich
> <andrew.n.senkevich@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Shouldn't there be generic address overflow checks which can be used
>>> by all targets?
>>
>> As for me I am not sure it is really needed.
>>
>> Here is new version of the patch.
>>
>
> Please checkout users/hjl/gold branch.  I moved has_overflow_signed,
> has_overflow_unsigned and has_overflow_bitfield from class
> Powerpc_relocate_functions to class Relocate_functions.  Can you
> use them to check relocation overflow in x86_64.cc?
>

I added partial relocation overflow check in x86_64.cc on
users/hjl/gold branch.  Please check it out.

-- 
H.J.