[PATCH] PR gold/18695

[H.J. Lu]

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Andrew Senkevich
<andrew.n.senkevich@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Shouldn't there be generic address overflow checks which can be used
>> by all targets?
>
> As for me I am not sure it is really needed.
>
> Here is new version of the patch.
>

Please checkout users/hjl/gold branch.  I moved has_overflow_signed,
has_overflow_unsigned and has_overflow_bitfield from class
Powerpc_relocate_functions to class Relocate_functions.  Can you
use them to check relocation overflow in x86_64.cc?

Thanks.


-- 
H.J.