[MIPS, backport] Testsuite fixes and minor functional backports for 2.25

Matthew Fortune Matthew.Fortune@imgtec.com
Fri Dec 19 11:34:00 GMT 2014


Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> writes:
> > On 18 Dec 2014, at 23:12, Matthew Fortune <Matthew.Fortune@imgtec.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tristan,
> >
> > There are three functional changes and some testsuite cleanup that I'd
> > like to put into 2.25 if that is OK?
> >
> > Re: [PATCH, MIPS] Minor amendments to R6 opcode table
> > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2014-12/msg00160.html
> >
> > RE: [PATCH, MIPS] When calculating a relocation using an undefined weak
> symbol don't check for overflow.
> > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2014-12/msg00019.html
> 
> I'm fine with that.
> 
> > With this patch resolving testsuite failures from the above:
> > (pending review) http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2014-12/msg00184.html
> >
> > RE: [PATCH, MIPS] Relax alignment check for LDPC
> > (pending review) http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2014-12/msg00176.html
> >
> > [PATCH, MIPS] Fix tx39-elf test failures
> > (pending review) http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2014-12/msg00185.html
> 
> Ok to backport, but I'd really like to do the release before Wednesday.

I guess this depends on whether Richard is already on vacation or not. Having
said that I would expect someone else to be able to approve the two testsuite
fixes which are pending. If the LDPC is missed then so be it.

thanks,
Matthew



More information about the Binutils mailing list