binutils 2.20 gone missing?

[Mike Frysinger]

On Thursday 17 January 2013 13:57:38 Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On 1/17/2013 12:43 PM, Sebastian Unger wrote:
> > Hi Joel,
> > 
> > that was 2.20.1a. The two are now identical in the archive, so 2.20.1a
> > replaced 2.20.1 completely. But there's no trace of 2.20.
> 
> Ahh...
> 
> I checked an RTEMS tools testing machine and I have the
> binutils-2.20.tar.bz2 file on it.
> 
> $ md5sum binutils-2.20.tar.bz2
> ee2d3e996e9a2d669808713360fa96f8  binutils-2.20.tar.bz2

FWIW, i have the same and here's some more signed hashes:
http://sources.gentoo.org/sys-devel/binutils/Manifest?revision=1.594
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20130117/45e8abc8/attachment.sig>