gold linker 2.22 regressed for DragonFly [revised testsuite results]

[Ian Lance Taylor]

John Marino <dragonflybsd@marino.st> writes:

> On 1/22/2012 8:43 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>> Sounds like it.  There may be a target independent problem here. What
>> should the linker do if the version script specifies that a symbol is
>> local but the symbol is also defined in a shared library?  I think it
>> has to make the symbol local despite the definitions, but it sounds like
>> that is not happening.
>
> Are you planning to independently verify and modify the linker
> behavior if confirmed?  From my point of view, there's nothing more to
> be done now that the situation is understood.

I suppose I will take a look at it at some point.

Ian