gold linker 2.22 regressed for DragonFly [revised testsuite results]

[John Marino]

On 1/22/2012 8:43 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> Sounds like it.  There may be a target independent problem here. What
> should the linker do if the version script specifies that a symbol is
> local but the symbol is also defined in a shared library?  I think it
> has to make the symbol local despite the definitions, but it sounds like
> that is not happening.

Are you planning to independently verify and modify the linker behavior 
if confirmed?  From my point of view, there's nothing more to be done 
now that the situation is understood.

John