2.22.1 Possible -> Yes!

Mike Frysinger vapier@gentoo.org
Fri Apr 27 01:31:00 GMT 2012

On Thursday 26 April 2012 20:39:11 Alan Modra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 03:29:22PM +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> > Ok, I will make a 2.22.1 release.
> I don't know why we bother with branches.  We just fool users into
> thinking that the branches are live, when really, not much activity
> takes place on binutils branches.

bugfixes get applied to the branches ... what more activity should there be ?

> > If anyone has patches to backport, please speak up.
> The 2.22 branch doesn't even build with current gcc.

by "current" you mean 4.7.x ?  or trunk ?  i don't think this matters all that 
much -- certainly anyone who packages binutils configures it with --disable-
werror.  in Gentoo, we never let a package build with -Werror precisely 
because of this sort of thing: newer gcc warns in new and creative ways, as 
often times do other architectures.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20120427/7537d956/attachment.sig>

More information about the Binutils mailing list