SEC_NEVER_LOAD cleanup

[Dave Korn]

On 05/11/2010 05:58, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 05:00:19AM +0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 26/10/2010 13:46, Alan Modra wrote:
>>> It seems we have irreconcilable differences between ELF and COFF in
>>> the treatment of NOLOAD.  How does the following look to you COFF
>>> people?
>>   Yes, please.
> 
> Committed with this ChangeLog.
> 
> 	* ldlang.c (lang_add_section): Distinguish ELF treatment of NOLOAD.
> 	(map_input_to_output_sections): Likewise.
> 	(lang_size_sections_1): Likewise.
> 	(IGNORE_SECTION): Don't test SEC_NEVER_LOAD.
> 	(lang_check_section_addresses): Likewise.

  TYVM :)

    cheers,
      DaveK