PATCH: PR ld/11146: Add "readelf --dyn-syms"
Mon Jan 11 13:51:00 GMT 2010
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:28:03PM +0000, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi H.J.
> >2010-01-07 H.J. Lu <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > PR ld/11146
> > * readelf.c (do_dyn_syms): New.
> > (OPTION_DYN_SYMBS): Likewise.
Why syms versus symbs?
It seems to me very confusing to have -Ds (dynamic symbols) and
--dyn-syms. The description in the manual sounds like -Ds and
--dyn-syms should both do what your new patch does. I wouldn't
be able to tell the difference. Is the existing -Ds useful? If both
are useful, the manual should differentiate them. If the other is not
useful, just change -Ds.
More information about the Binutils