[PATCH v4] Fixups of Loongson2F
Nick Clifton
nickc@redhat.com
Fri Feb 26 13:13:00 GMT 2010
Hi Richard, Hi Wu,
> Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply, but can I ask you to reconsider?
Certainly. My concern is that I believe that this patch (or a better
one) is needed in order to allow the Linux kernel to work on Loongson-2f
parts. If this is true then I think that it is important that we try to
resolve the problem.
> Anyway, the reason I don't think it's ready is that I think the
> jump changes should be integrated into the existing macro code,
> rather than tacked in at the beginning of append_insn.
Ok - is this something that you could do ? I would offer, but MIPS
assembler is a black art to me.
Wu - did you understand Richard's objections to your patch ? If so,
please could you look into creating a better patch ?
Cheers
Nick
More information about the Binutils
mailing list