ARM long branch stubs: cleanup

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 01:03:57PM +0000, Paul Brook wrote:
> On Friday 06 March 2009, Christophe LYON wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > With the attached small patch, I propose to remove an error-prone switch
> > statement to get the correct stub template and size in arm_size_one_stub().
> > It is replaced by an (error-prone :-) array defined next to the stub
> > themselves.
> >
> > Maybe it would save some maintenance issues.
> 
> If you rework the preprocessor macros a bit you can generate both the enum and 
> the array from the same list.

But then you get backslashes all over the place - is it an
improvement?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery