Adding -z nonow to complement -z now

Kevin F. Quinn kevquinn@gentoo.org
Wed Jun 14 00:41:00 GMT 2006


On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 10:23:21 -0700
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> wrote:

> Alan Modra wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:00:03PM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> >> Attached is a little patch that adds '-z nonow' as the opposite of
> >> '-z now'.  Could it be considered for inclusion, please?
> > 
> > You need to provide a proper changelog entry, and describe the
> > option in [...]
> 
> You cannot honestly consider allowing a patch introducing -z nonow.
> What is the opposite to 'now' in ELF terms?  It's not 'nonow', it's
> 'lazy'.

Ok; attached is an updated patch, hopefully I've addressed issues as
required so far.  Anything more, please say.

Thanks,
-- 
Kevin F. Quinn
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: binutils-060613-zlazy.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2286 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20060614/6d3529fb/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20060614/6d3529fb/attachment.sig>


More information about the Binutils mailing list