Adding -z nonow to complement -z now
Kevin F. Quinn
kevquinn@gentoo.org
Wed Jun 14 00:41:00 GMT 2006
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 10:23:21 -0700
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> wrote:
> Alan Modra wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:00:03PM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> >> Attached is a little patch that adds '-z nonow' as the opposite of
> >> '-z now'. Could it be considered for inclusion, please?
> >
> > You need to provide a proper changelog entry, and describe the
> > option in [...]
>
> You cannot honestly consider allowing a patch introducing -z nonow.
> What is the opposite to 'now' in ELF terms? It's not 'nonow', it's
> 'lazy'.
Ok; attached is an updated patch, hopefully I've addressed issues as
required so far. Anything more, please say.
Thanks,
--
Kevin F. Quinn
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: binutils-060613-zlazy.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2286 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20060614/6d3529fb/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20060614/6d3529fb/attachment.sig>
More information about the Binutils
mailing list