Adding -z nonow to complement -z now

Kevin F. Quinn kevquinn@gentoo.org
Tue Jun 13 18:10:00 GMT 2006


On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 10:23:21 -0700
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> wrote:

> You cannot honestly consider allowing a patch introducing -z nonow.
> What is the opposite to 'now' in ELF terms?  It's not 'nonow', it's
> 'lazy'.

Good point, I agree - nonow is a legacy name from our side hence I never
thought to change it.  I'll work that in with the other changes Alan
asked for.

-- 
Kevin F. Quinn
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20060613/4219a29c/attachment.sig>


More information about the Binutils mailing list