Your gas changes caused weakref failures for cris-elf, supposedly others too
Alexandre Oliva
aoliva@redhat.com
Thu Oct 27 14:08:00 GMT 2005
On Oct 27, 2005, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
> Hmm, interesting. Which way to fix this actually depends on the
> intentions with weak references - if they're supposed to be
> re-definable, then assign_symbol() or s_weakref() would need to take
> care of this. If not, the test is broken. Alexandre, can you clarify the
> intentions?
Either way is fine. I wouldn't mind if they were not redefinable, but
I wanted to play along with .set et al, that allowed redefinitions.
As long as it's consistent (i.e., .weakref can be a redefinition *and*
can be redefined, or neither of these), I'm open to change. GCC, the
prime user of this feature, will never issue redefinitions for correct
programs anyway.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
More information about the Binutils
mailing list